RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?

To:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?
From:	"James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:22:17 +1100
Delivery-date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:26:33 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcYMw62+P6CDCtHrQsu9jvfDBMo1GgAAGTsgAAKObSA=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?

> > What's the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for
> > you? Better than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments!
> 
> 3.0-testing has a number of bug fixes in it over 3.0.0 -- it should
> definitely be used in preference to 3.0.0. It's effectively a 3.0.0.x
> series.

Ah the world of open source... where anything tagged 'stable' probably 
shouldn't be used because it is either a) too old, or b) too buggy.

But we wouldn't have it any other way.

Maybe that memory leak which crashes my dom0 has been fixed... I'll have to 
give -testing a go.

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel