RE: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation

To:	"graham" <the_ether@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:45:16 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:42:29 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcXbXyQ/+G+A0cNLR1iCvWnpZfTS/gAAd1eQ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation

 

> Yes, that would solve my concern about wasted resource of 
> having multiple copies of the same OS when all I want to do 
> is run multiple apps.

OSes are pretty small compared to the apps that get run in them, so its
not as big a win as you might think...

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu), Nakajima, Jun

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VT] xm reboot for vmx domain, Yu, Ke

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, graham

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Unable to get sources with the last version of mercurial, Philippe Berthault

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]