Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed chan

To:	"Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes
From:	harry <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:18:53 +0100
Cc:	xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sean Dague <sean@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:17:26 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0507290853200.15329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<20050729130420.GC8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1122647104.28631.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050729144458.GA9991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507290853200.15329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 08:54 -0600, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:

> > I think this needs to take a much more user centric, Model-View-Controler
> > approach.  
> 
> I think I'm with sean on this one. 

Well, I don't think anything I said is incompatible with a
model-view-controller approach so I'm probably with Sean on that one
too.

Harry.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes