[Xen-devel] RE: x86_64 SMP support (status update)

["Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chris Wright wrote:
> * Chris Wright (chrisw@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> * Nakajima, Jun (jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>> Good progress and good start, i.e. we have at least one virutal
>>> processor there :-). 
>>> 
>>> We'll look at the problem too.
>> 
>> Great, thanks.  I'm pretty suspect of the gdt, but only on a hunch.
>> Any clues why the copy is faulting might be useful.
> 
> Here's an updated patch that fixes that faulting.  It uses gdt per
> page like i386 is doing, still crashing upon schedule.  Why does each
> gdt entry need it's own page?
> 
> thanks,
> -chris

Each gdt entry? I think gdt should be per vcpu, but I don't understand
"each gdt entry". Can you please point to the code you are talking
about?

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel