xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [patch] l?e_get_value() & L?_DISALLOW_MASK is (now) meaningl

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] [patch] l?e_get_value() & L?_DISALLOW_MASK is (now) meaningless
From:	"Scott Parish" <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2005 19:29:28 +0000
Delivery-date:	Tue, 31 May 2005 20:07:29 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Use l?e_get_flags() instead.

sRp

-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@xxxxxxxxxx

flags.diff
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [patch] l?e_get_value() & L?_DISALLOW_MASK is (now) meaningless, Scott Parish <=

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] [patch] cpuid size for x86_64, Scott Parish
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] Latest bk can NOT compile on x86_64, David F Barrera
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [patch] cpuid size for x86_64, Scott Parish
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] 2.0.6 and sata via., Flavio Leitner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]