Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)

To: Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)
From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:53:31 +0900
Cc: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:52:47 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ST90xeIjJmKRnU4NmQZWMjA4nPPROWOW1u9p8en8xT9PSJIJ20EmqHNTFkds0EyAdf6ABJZz8kbGqZ0rQ/uSuJH9wQ0nN0Ouv8760xnOtsmfhFsBnQWnu59LrNV9mM5bnIsKLHgJZgNC1su3QtbYcBowWZ5aj/NBE3ul972HCzA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9cde8bff050530182342a79827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/31/05, Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/31/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch (against -unstable ChangeSet@xxxxxx) does the followings:
> >
> > - put some configurable variables to xend_config.sxp, and set them to
> > default values. That will make people aware of their existence, and
> > let them easily reconfigure xend when needed.
> 
> I've not applied this part because we're not sure we're going to keep
> some of these.

i see the point, but how about part of this patch in -testing tree
(see http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg01204.html).
i believe that those options are stable, so if you apply -testing
patch (this -testing patch got no comment), we should keep the same
options in this patch, and not reject them all.

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel