Re: [Xen-devel] process killed

To:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] process killed
From:	Brian Hays <brian.hays@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:28:07 -0400
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:27:50 +0000
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nLgJpvD+UV/y+jvaoSl+3TmDl/qFCorKIGZdC2uFSUBOoJSbfk7EO9pb14DBJQS+doK/A675tV0Rvko9UaRLklF3gPxfEfosMH9p/qWRnqhnC5nHV1fDkJcL1zIPBakkJOIDZHevRK0tsouEYz9jFsj5BLHEBCIBDNLUPFBGY44=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050428074006.GB24599@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<e4ca66ec05042717247d0d8751@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428074006.GB24599@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	Brian Hays <brian.hays@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yeah, Ive tried it with 64MB all the way up to 512MB of RAM allocated
to the domU. I definitely think it's related to memory though...As
soon as I start the DigiChat process you can see the memory spike full
and it doesn't seem to use swap at all....about a second or two after
starting it will just give the process ID and say "killed".

Thanks,
Brian

On 4/28/05, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:24:41PM -0400, Brian Hays wrote:
> 
> > I've come across a strange problem when installing a particular
> > software package in a domU. I'm trying to install DigiChat
> > (http://www.digichat.com/downloads.html) and the process is
> > immediately killed.
> 
> Killed how?  With what signal?
> 
> My guess is OOM.  Add more memory to domU and see if that helps.
> 
> > Is there anything about Java that Xen doesn't play nice with right
> > now?
> 
> My guess is that it uses lots of memory.
> 
> Does the JVM use TLS a lot?  I'm guessing not if it works under UML.
> Something else to check anyhow.
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] null pointer in domU, Keir Fraser
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] process killed, Ian Pratt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] process killed, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] process killed, Ian Pratt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]