Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.
From: peter bier <peter_bier@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:45:47 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E389F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt <at> cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:

> 
> > I found out that dom0 does file-system IO and raw IO ( using 
> > dd as a tool to test
> > throughput from the disk ) is about exactly the same as when 
> > using a standard 
> > linux kernel without XEN. But the raw IO from DomU to an 
> > unused disk ( a second
> > disk in the system ) is limited to fourty percent of the 
> > speed I get within Dom0.
> 
> Just to be clear: you're doing a dd performance test within dom0 to the
> exact same partition on the 2nd disk that you're using when you start
> the domU and finding that the domU 'dd' performance is 40% of the dom0
> performance?
> 
> I've not heard of anyone else having problems like this. What happens if
> you use a partition on the 1st disk?
> 
> What chipset is the IDE controller? What device (e.g. sda1) are you
> exporting the disk partition into the domU as?
> 
> Are you sure dom 0 is idle when doing the dd test in the domU?
> 
> Ian
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
> 


Yes I do the performance testing using dd. It's only a simple "benchmark" but
its results seem to indicate
a fundamental issue. I did the tests with the same partitions from DOM0 just as
DomU. I used both disks
and Dom0 achieved in all experiments 2.5 times the transfer rate of DomU.

I do not know the chipset of my IDE controller on my computer at home, while I
know that in the office it
pas a Promise raid controller ( I am neither at home nor in the office
momentarily ) . I am sure, that the
system was idle during all test ( meaning that there was only the standard
system running with no busy
jobs and no user program consuming CPU or IO resources.

I am very interested about Xen, but I need to fiy that problem.
If there is any "checklist" how to configure XEN efficiently, I might be able to
fix the problem myself

Thanks

Peter Bier 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel