Re: [Xen-API] New API Document and C Bindings

[Ronald Perez <ronpz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Gareth Bestor wrote on 09/15/2006 10:04:46 AM:

> I'm kinda leaning towards what Dan is thinking - right now Dom0 is
'special' only 
> because it is the one Domain given administrative control of all the
host 
> resources. But if this role is effectively farmed out to future drive
and stub 
> domains, and this ability can be added arbitrarily to *any* domain,
then 
> effectively any domain can assume the role of a (partial) management
domain at any 
> time, so we're basically left with a flat model - ie "all domains
are created equal" :-)
> 
> - Gareth
> 

I don't think Dan and John are as far apart as Ewan's
first proposal and Dan's/John's proposals. I think Dan and John are saying
the same thing, but probably in two different languages / from two different
perspectives.

If I'm wrong, someone please clarify the differences
between Dan's and John's proposals from both a CIM and Xen API standpoint.

Thanks,
-Ron
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api